I didn't represent it exactly. That is obvious. I gave my interpretation of what I saw as an implication and that was to Vade. Now where would I get the impression that if a neutral gene was not eliminated it would have to be fixed? Could it be that I read a link that Vade posted that made the following statements?
Drift is thus like a genetic fly paper. The walls are loss and fixation, and sooner or later (depending on the population size), the fly (allele frequency) will hit a wall and be "stuck". These properties of genetic drift have been demonstrated empirically many times but they also are easy to see in computer simulations. .
Now given the choices as outlined in Vade's link, if extinction(loss) is rejected, what remains?
P.S. The link is in post 1642.