Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BMCDA
If the newly mutated gene is detrimental then it is unlikely that this copy will be inherited.

Genes and disease

MOST OF THE genetic disorders featured on this web site are the direct result of a mutation in one gene. However, one of the most difficult problems ahead is to find out how genes contribute to diseases that have a complex pattern of inheritance, such as in the cases of diabetes, asthma, cancer and mental illness. In all these cases, no one gene has the yes/no power to say whether a person has a disease or not. It is likely that more than one mutation is required before the disease is manifest, and a number of genes may each make a subtle contribution to a person's susceptibility to a disease; genes may also affect how a person reacts to environmental factors. Unraveling these networks of events will undoubtedly be a challenge for some time to come, and will be amply assisted by the availability of the draft (and complete) sequence of the human genome.

1,198 posted on 06/19/2002 9:04:03 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1192 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
That's certainly true. Most genetic diseases are the manifestation of not one gene but more "working" together. However, if one of these genes lacks (or is somehow different) then the others are just neutral and this particular individual doesn't have this disease. So if the disease that is triggered by this gene is so severe as to prevent procreation than this gene is not inherited but the other genes are. So if the same or a similar mutation occurrs in an other individual, the other genes are already present which means it has this disease.
1,219 posted on 06/19/2002 10:34:53 AM PDT by BMCDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson