Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWingNilla
Just about every gene I can think of is categorized into a hierarchical arrangement where it can be safely assumed they have arisen from duplication of an ancestral precursor.

A very bold statement and one I have never heard an evolutionist make. In fact, the only example I have heard of discussed is hemoglobin. I would think we need some reference for the above. If they are duplicated genes they need to be the same size and have a fairly similar sequence. Reference?

1,138 posted on 06/18/2002 8:45:14 PM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
A very bold statement and one I have never heard an evolutionist make. In fact, the only example I have heard of discussed is hemoglobin. I would think we need some reference for the above. If they are duplicated genes they need to be the same size and have a fairly similar sequence. Reference?

Wow, where to begin? It is taken as an absolute given in biology that genes are related to each other.

Here are a few reports from the genomebiology website...

A nice analysis of a family of the bHLH transcription factors: http://genomebiology.com/2002/3/6/research/0030/

Mammalian Olfactory (smell) receptors: http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/6/research/0018/

These belong to a huge superfamily of proteins which act as molecular switches in the cell. All of these guys are very similar in size/structure yet they have distinct functions:
http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/5/reviews/3007/?isguard=1

This was just a quick search.

If you are really interested you can BLAST away here:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/

...with your gene of interest.

1,148 posted on 06/18/2002 10:03:22 PM PDT by RightWingNilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson