Prove it. Quote them. Name, date, reply # and thread reference.
Unless you can do it you need to retract that statement to avoid being charged with using the same sort of disengenuous tactics that are used by Clintoon to mislead his useful idiots.
Prove it. Quote them. Name, date, reply # and thread reference.
Matchet, for mercy's sake, this is only a forum, not a congressional investigation. I'm not accusing anyone of anything. It is just that on some occasions, when someone makes an argument such as that based on Acts 16:30 "And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house," that one must do something to be saved, and that something is to "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ," some Calvinists have protested the argument is for "works salvation."
If none of them have ever said that, then I'm mistaken, period. Nevertheless, I'm quite sure I've seen it on this forum, but if not, I've certainly read it elsewhere.
Really, Matchett-PI, you need to lighten up a little bit. Everybody knows there is disagreement here, else there wouldn't be any discussion. It is the reason for the discussion. But if no one is allowed to express their veiws in the best light they can, there won't be any discussion.
If Calvinists do not hold that believing on the Lord Jesus Christ is a work, than they will have no objection to the argument that, what one must "do" to be save is to "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ," period, because doing that is not doing work.
Hank