You'll need to reread what I wrote. I did not specifically accuse you personally of anything. Do you deny that Catholics have targeted Jews in the past for retribution for "deicide"?
I am happy to do so. IT IS BLASPHEMY.
Yawn. "Blasphemy", by definition, is something said against God. Since Jesus isn't God, it can hardly be blasphemy.
No. They lied about Him while He was alive
Sez you. Your remarks are grounded in the assumption that Jesus was who he was claimed to be. I don't buy that.
The Gospel of John is TRUTH.
the gospel of John is not inspired. It is a mix of some actual history and much pious hagiography.
That you experience the witness of truth as an attack is judgement about you, isn't it?
If it were truth, it might be.
BTW, I will alert you a second time to the FACT that I am not moved by such twaddle.
You sure do like CAPITAL LETTERS, don't you? Let me REMIND you that it was YOUR HYSTERICAL RANT that PROVOKED ME to reply to you IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Grow-up.
Physician, heal thyself.
You just offered a half-assed defense
Please: NO profanity...
of BLASPHEMY against Jesus our Saviour
Its not blasphemy. Jesus isn't God. He isn't "our Saviour". He was a man. That is the "TRUTH". If you are going to try to push your beliefs on me, don't expect to hold back from saying what I believe. If you find it blasphemous, tough.
Your arrogance is astounding
LOL! The irony of such a statement coming from you is truly amusing.
I was responding to the article. You inserted yourself into the arguement for reasons known only to yourself. Defending the truth is not the same as "push your beliefs on me." That is an absurd comment.
You abandoned Catholicism for Judaism and now you want to instruct me on how properly to be a Christian? Look, I don't tell you how to act as a Jew, so....
I USE THEM TO DENOTE ANGER OR EMPHASIS