Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exploring God(Creator)'s Handiwork(Creation) vs. ugly-vain-silly science(devilution).
The New American ^ | Published: December 22, 1997 | Author: Fr. James Thorton

Posted on 05/06/2002 2:11:30 PM PDT by f.Christian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: bobg
Thanks for a quick illustration of #16.
Please don't shout on your next post, OK? Thanks.
21 posted on 05/06/2002 2:45:32 PM PDT by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pocat
May I try?
Morality is the consequence of volitional choice.
Genetic origins are independent of volition.
How'd I do?
22 posted on 05/06/2002 2:49:33 PM PDT by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pocat
Wouldn't that be 'intra'-species evolution--adaptation you are talking about?
23 posted on 05/06/2002 2:59:47 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: CDedPeeple
You didn't miss anything. He defended the author of this silly article by citing the fact that a different guy who writes other articles has lots of degrees.

The all-caps was intended to add the weight of import that his words failed to carry, I guess.

25 posted on 05/06/2002 3:09:15 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AzJP
How'd I do?

OK I guess.

But will other creatures someday 'evolve' enough to form a collective moral code among their species? If we did it, can they also?

I'll keep an eye out for that, as well as the 'missing link'.

26 posted on 05/06/2002 3:09:18 PM PDT by pocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
'intra'-species evolution

Yes - the opposite of CROSS-species evolution.

27 posted on 05/06/2002 3:11:16 PM PDT by pocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pocat
I can't even articulate speculation.
Your long distance vision is sharper than mine.
28 posted on 05/06/2002 3:12:07 PM PDT by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bobg
"Were it not for the existence of sin in the world, says Calvin, human beings would believe in God to the same degree and with the same natural spontaneity displayed in our belief in the existence of other persons, or an external world, or the past. This is the natural human condition; it is because of our presently unnatural sinful condition that many of us find belief in God difficult or absurd. The fact is, Calvin thinks, one who does not believe in God is in an epistemically defective position-rather like someone who does not believe that his wife exists, or thinks that she is a cleverly constructed robot that has no thoughts, feelings, or consciousness. Thus the believer reverses Freud and Marx, claiming that what they see... as sickness---is really health and what they see as health is really sickness."
29 posted on 05/06/2002 3:13:19 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CDedPeeple
"Absurd" seems more descriptive.

For you--evolution...'OZARKS' is better!

30 posted on 05/06/2002 4:15:25 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson