To: Cachelot
Are you going to concentrate on the information itself or are you going to continue to pretend that because a picture and a caption came from Hoffman's site, it is false information? LOL.
Clearly, you are trying the same guilt-by-association techniques that you have used time and time again.
The same tactic was used against the veterans of the USS Liberty too. Eye-witnesses to the event were called Nazi sympathizers for the mere fact of relating their eye-witness accounts.
Whatever. It doesn't work. I'm not going away. And I'm not an anti-Semite or holocaust denier. Neither you or Hoffman can convince me to go negative on Jews simply because they are Jews.
675 posted on
04/28/2002 7:56:50 AM PDT by
Demidog
To: Demidog
You are LOL-ing a bit too much here methinks. A tad defensive. Posting blood libels, like the BS that Israel has bulldozed homes packed with Palestinians is not exactly friendly to Jews. Nor is cribbing pix from anti-Semitic hate sites.
To: Cachelot
Now doggie's bringing up the Liberty, the last line of defense of the true anti-semite and Holocaust denier--oh, geez, let's see: Hoffman, David Irving, Willis Carto & Spotlight....he's hit them all.
681 posted on
04/28/2002 8:03:42 AM PDT by
Catspaw
To: Demidog;Admin Moderator
Are you going to concentrate on the information itself or are you going to continue to pretend that because a picture and a caption came from Hoffman's site, it is false information? LOL. Geez, doggie. I asked you a question: are you claiming that holocoust-denial sites are good and credible sources for information? Yes or no? And while we're at it: how much of the stuff on Hoffman's site do you find credible (agreee with)? Now, please answer.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson