Posted on 04/27/2002 9:37:19 AM PDT by TheLurkerX
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:33:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
JERUSALEM
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I would be very interested in seeing your vehement condemnation of Palestinian terrorism, especially if that condemnation comes spontaneously and is not part of a defense against the charge of anti-semitism.
Having never confronted the links presented earlier, I find it bizarre for you to refer to these facts as bizarre. The forensic evidence leads to the logical conclusion that a gunman in very close proximity to the cameraman murdered him, it wasn't a stray Israeli round.
That's Palestinian Freedom Fighting (kill the 5 year old's under their beds). Whats to condemn.
I pray that child is at peace, and that her murderers feel the terror, which for her was short lived, for eternity.
I think the Swiss have the right idea.
Also, it is possible that he may go au-natural (heart attack) In either case, it will be likely reported that way.
Bush's diplomatic hand is tied up until something breaks. There is not much he can do except deliver lip service. Maybe they could do something covert. Who knows...........perhaps "the shadow!"
Another little tantrum? Good thing I don't take you seriously or I would report this as abuse. Don't worry - I think I now remember that I have had a run-in with you before and meant to have no further dealings with people with manners like you have. I slipped up and forgot - I won't again.
Yeah becuase you posted the same link again and called me a liar and the link did the same damn thing (took me to a page that had no posts from you or Travis McGee).
Tell you what, if you want to test it out, set your preferences to view 20 posts per page and then try it out. Of course then you would have to admit that the link doesn't take you to post 289 and that wouldn't do at all.
I want to see your vehement condemnation of Palestinian terrorism OUTSIDE of the context of you defending yourself against the voiced (or clearly implied) charge of antisemitism.
Up to now, I have observed only the situation in which it takes someone telling you that you are against Jews and/or Israel to squeeze that condemnation out of you.
It makes one wonder if the condemnation is given grudgingly, and is a defense against an allegation -- rather than a freely given voice to one's true internal opinion.
Um.
Dumber.
In a conversation with you, that would be impossible.
14 year old boys with Kalishnikov machine guns and ammo belts came out of the Church of the Nativity. They were taken into custody by the IDF.
But remember. The Palestinians would never use children.
I'm not requiring that you restrict the example to ones involving conversations with me. Any spontaneous condemnation of Palestinian terrorism will do.
No, my issue is that you are playacting the internet neophyte. You know plenty about URL's and certainly could find my response. You are playing dumb(er), and you aren't fooling anyone.
The world net daily article offered no forensics whatsoever to support the assertions. IDF apologized for the killing. Yes, they did say they may have made a mistake by apologizing. But they assumed that they had killed the boy.
As far as the German TV show goes, (And we've gone through this before) there isn't any indication of what was on the show other than a blanket statement saying that the show concluded it was a palestinian gunman. The program was in German. I would wonder though, if the evidence was so compelling, why in the world nobody else, including the Israeli media has presented the forensic evidence.
Good grief. It took a second post with you insisting that the link would take me to your post before I looked at the URL and then did figure out what the hell was going on.
I could care less if you think I was avoiding answering the question by secretly covering up an obscure forum bug that I had discovered 5 minutes earlier (and I explained to you how that worked). I really needed the time to.....uhh....what exactly? In the time period between posts, what did I avoid? Do you seriously think that your posts and your stellar manners have compelled me to answer your interrogatories?
You really need to seek help. I'm serious. Your inability to acknowledge your own mistakes is causing you to look for bizarre conspiracies when the simplest answer would explain what occurred.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.