Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CindyDawg; tHe AnTiLiB; Quester; IMRight
I am confused at the responses to the original Quester post. Maybe someone will straighten me out.

(tHe AnTiLiB posted) HE INTERPRETED SCRIPTURE DIFFERENTLY THAN WHAT THE BIBLE CLEARLY SAID, ... NOT REBELLIOUS, BUT SMART.

(Quester replied) JESUS is the AUTHOR of the scriptures. As such, He has the right and perogatve to provide us with the correct interpretation of the scriptures.

(tHe AnTiLiB replied) Jesus wasn't around when the scriptures were written by the "Father?"

(Reggie comment) Seems kinda crazy to me, but not unexpected from the anti one.

(Now Cindy replies to Anti) Morning, antilib. Glad you are reading your bible. What scripture are you finding this in ? CD

(Now IMRight chimes in) "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning." - John 1: 1-2

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What am I missing? What sense does Anti's reply make?

Is IMRight serious? Is he aware of the context involved in the series of posts? Is he providing Quester with information he is not familiar with?

52,304 posted on 05/08/2003 9:31:39 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52297 | View Replies ]


To: OLD REGGIE; tHe AnTiLiB; Quester
What am I missing? What sense does Anti's reply make?

Not a lot. He seems to be operating under the (quite incorrect) premise that Jesus specifically contradicted the meaning of the commandments, as set forth in the OT when He "Worked" on the Sabbath.

Quester points out that Jesus can provide us with the correct interpretation, which is exactly the correct position.

Antilib seems to have, despite Quester's clear identification of Jesus as the Author of Scripture, taken Quester's position to be that Jesus was not around to write Scripture correctly the first time, and had to "change" it.

Which is, as I said, very confused and incorrect.

SD

52,310 posted on 05/08/2003 9:39:43 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52304 | View Replies ]

To: OLD REGGIE
Is IMRight serious? Is he aware of the context involved in the series of posts? Is he providing Quester with information he is not familiar with?

What am I missing? You don't think this is a reference to Christ? Not evidence that He was around when the Father wrote Scripture (whatever the heck THAT is supposed to mean)?

52,334 posted on 05/08/2003 10:19:54 AM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52304 | View Replies ]

To: OLD REGGIE
(Now Cindy replies to Anti) Morning, antilib. Glad you are reading your bible. What scripture are you finding this in ? CD

Can't speak for the others but mine was that this guy really needs help with interpretation.

52,416 posted on 05/08/2003 1:11:19 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52304 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson