To: tHe AnTiLiB
Did you see the worlds biggest however. One paragraph that tries to praise the Lord and even that is through Mary, then back to exalting Mary. I have been considering how much RC's much hate Paul. He never once used Mary's name he unfolded so man secrets about the Lord and had a thousand opportunities to reveal those special De Montfortian secrets about Mary, but didn't. He put Peter, the first inerrant pope, in his place. I sure don't get that Marianism from the Apostle Paul. It is all invention from the likes of De Montfort and pope whats his face.
51,965 posted on
05/07/2003 5:20:49 AM PDT by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
To: biblewonk
Paul... never once used Mary's name. He unfolded so many secrets about the Lord and had a thousand opportunities to reveal those special De Montfortian secrets about Mary, but didn't.This bears repeating! All those churches he planted, all those inspired letters he wrote, and not one hint of what is for some the number one pastime.
51,966 posted on
05/07/2003 6:01:49 AM PDT by
newgeezer
(fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible)
To: biblewonk
One paragraph that tries to praise the Lord and even that is through Mary, then back to exalting Mary. What do you ignore the CONTENT of that paragraph? It puts into perspective his effusive praise of Mary. No matter what else he says, this means that it does not amount to the apotheosis of Mary. It is simply a paean to the Moher of Our Lord.
To: biblewonk
I have been considering how much RC's much hate Paul. You don't know the half of it. Did you know that the Vatican has scholars working night and day to assist Minneapolis in developing "Twin City" jokes?
SD
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson