Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CindyDawg
What do you think of this. It is from a sermon by Cardinal Newman on faith and doubt.

I must insist on this: faith implies a confidence in a man’s mind, that the thing believed is really true; but, if it is once true, it never can be false. If it is true that God became man, what is the meaning of my anticipating a time when perhaps I shall not believe that God became man? This is nothing short of anticipating a time when I shall disbelieve a truth. And if I bargain to be allowed in time to come not to believe, or to doubt, that God became man, I am but asking to be allowed to doubt or disbelieve what I hold to be an eternal truth. I do not see the privilege of such a permission at all, or the meaning of wishing to secure it: if at present I have no doubt whatever about it, then I am but asking leave to fall into error; if at present I have doubts about it, then I do not believe it at present, that is, I have not faith. . . . I may love by halves, I may obey by halves; I cannot believe by halves: either I have faith, or I have it not.

51,594 posted on 05/05/2003 7:54:10 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51589 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
3 sermons a week about all I can handle. lol. This Stuff deep. I'll study it tomorrow. Too tired tonight.
51,595 posted on 05/05/2003 8:04:49 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51594 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson