[SoothingDave]

Dave could I get you to respond to this scripture and how it relates to horny pediphile priests? I've asked about 3 times now. I've even answered all the questions you've asked.

Is "horny" necessary? Are you puffed up?

I agree with the Scripture. What do you think I think? It has always clearly been my position that such men should be removed from the priesthood. Ask anyone.

Which is entirely irrelevant to the question of whether a man's sins make it imposible for him to act validly as a priest. No, they do not. That was also made clear.

Someone with serious problems should not be working in the ministry and should have no authority to perform sacraments. He should be "de-frocked." That has always been my position. Nobody I know was in favor of what the bishops did who shuffled these cases around. Nobody.

But none of that changes the fact that a man who is ordained a priest becomes a channel for Christ.

SD

[Invincibly Ignorant]

Is "horny" necessary? Are you puffed up?

Pediphile priests are not horney?

[Invincibly Ignorant]

But none of that changes the fact that a man who is ordained a priest becomes a channel for Christ.

Sorry in those scriptures I posted, the apostle Paul disagrees with you. If they're pokin' kids they should be gone right away. No more channeling.

[malakhi]

I agree with the Scripture. What do you think I think? It has always clearly been my position that such men should be removed from the priesthood. Ask anyone.

Yep, I can vouch for this.