Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: biblewonk
Notice the imediate retraction of some of the impact then right back to the adulation.

You mean this:

We must take care, however, not to consider this dependence as an abasement or imperfection in Jesus Christ. For Mary, infinitely inferior to her Son, who is God, does not command him in the same way as an earthly mother would command her child who is beneath her.

Yours is a cynical reading. If, instead, you read it as it was intended, you would have nothing to complain about.

Consider it an "overriding theme" to the work.

SD

49,493 posted on 04/29/2003 11:45:17 AM PDT by SoothingDave (It might behoove me to be heaved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49489 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
Consider it an "overriding theme" to the work.

It's a minor undertown mentioned only as damage control.

49,517 posted on 04/29/2003 12:20:36 PM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49493 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson