Yes, and you have yet to back it up with any teaching from Scripture.
Thanks (again) for your thoughts, your words and your specifications on the matter of what constitutes a man.
Nonetheless, I remain willing to learn from His.
So you're not open to an exchange of thought. You take one, unrelated passage, and decide against all of historical Christianity that Jesus was not "born" of woman.
You can't explain what that means, and you refuse to engage questions about the implications for the Redpemption.
SD