Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
I've only brought up the objection about 10 times in the last week.

Yes, and you have yet to back it up with any teaching from Scripture.

Thanks (again) for your thoughts, your words and your specifications on the matter of what constitutes a man.

Nonetheless, I remain willing to learn from His.

49,096 posted on 04/28/2003 11:55:44 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49087 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer
Thanks (again) for your thoughts, your words and your specifications on the matter of what constitutes a man. Nonetheless, I remain willing to learn from His.

So you're not open to an exchange of thought. You take one, unrelated passage, and decide against all of historical Christianity that Jesus was not "born" of woman.

You can't explain what that means, and you refuse to engage questions about the implications for the Redpemption.

SD

49,103 posted on 04/28/2003 12:06:07 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49096 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson