Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: AlguyA
I've got to admit, I'm stunned at this.

It just underscores the difference between those who only go by the Book, and and start anew each generation; and those who are free to work on the ideas of those who came before.

Like you, I was stunned that such a thing would even be questioned. It is ironic that those who think it "obvious" that a man and wife must have sex, can not see the obviousness of a mother being related to her Child.

And, the implications for the Incarnation are perilous.

SD

49,080 posted on 04/28/2003 11:36:57 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49062 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
And, the implications for the Incarnation are perilous.

Chapter and verse, please.

49,083 posted on 04/28/2003 11:44:03 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49080 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson