Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: AlguyA
"In other words He is not of Mary. She is not His mother genetically. He did not come from one of her eggs. Sure he came through her but he is not of her."

This was posted by biblewonk. I'm curious. Do all you other Protestants agree with this?

I agree that it's a valid question. There's no Scriptural evidence or requirement that He be of her egg. There is Scriptural support for her not being so. In short, if I had to choose, I'd say the egg wasn't hers.

Is this a standard Protestant belief?

"Belief"? I'd be shocked if it's the subject of any doctrinal statements either way. We all know she's His mother. Thus, the overwhelming majority likely assumes she's His biological mother without giving it any thought. But, search the Scriptures, and the question is (surprisingly, for some) totally validated.

It's completely understandable how some refuse to acknowledge that validity. It would ruin their whole day.

49,041 posted on 04/28/2003 10:50:49 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49024 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer
There is Scriptural support for her not being so.

Lets see it.

BigMack

49,047 posted on 04/28/2003 10:54:22 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49041 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson