[SoothingDave]

You. You brought it up.

No, you did:

Our knowledge as of today is that the female egg is X chromosone. The male sperm are Ys and Xs. xx=girl xy=boy. If only tissue of Mary were replicated then wouldn't she have birthed a daughter? But, it didn't happen this way. Why? Caz we aren't as smart as we think we are? Caz with God all things are possible?

47,575 posted on 04/21/2003 10:48 AM EDT by CindyDawg

You stated that if Mary was the source of Jesus' humanity, that he woudl have to be female. That is, of course, to limit God in how He does His Miracles.

SD

[OLD REGGIE]

You stated that if Mary was the source of Jesus' humanity, that he woudl have to be female. That is, of course, to limit God in how He does His Miracles.

Did she? Let's look at what she said.

"Our knowledge as of today is that the female egg is X chromosone. The male sperm are Ys and Xs. xx=girl xy=boy. If only tissue of Mary were replicated then wouldn't she have birthed a daughter? But, it didn't happen this way. Why? Caz we aren't as smart as we think we are? Caz with God all things are possible?"

Where is her statement? My statement is, you have deliberately twisted her words.

[CindyDawg]

You. You brought it up.

No, you did

No, you did :')

[CindyDawg]

You stated that if Mary was the source of Jesus' humanity, that he woudl have to be female. That is, of course, to limit God in how He does His Miracles

. We have already established that this was not my intent, but say it had have been. What's the difference in me limiting God in how he does miracles by saying the above vs you limiting him by saying he had to make Jesus' physical body from Mary's? To me, since He did not tell us, to insist on either one is wrong.