It isn't made up. I sourced it on here several pages back. Donatus was accused because he was stirring things up by preaching against those who were doing so and telling their congregations it was ok to do. So happens he was as right on that as on rebaptism.
LOL. You rambled for a long time, but the only thing you "sourced" was an encyclopedia entry which said that Donatus was barred for questioning whether a man's sinfulness effect his ordination. There was nothing, NOTHING in there about these alleged "roman god" things.
So again, please post the comic book from whence you got it.
Donatus was accused because he was stirring things up by preaching against those who were doing so and telling their congregations it was ok to do. So happens he was as right on that as on rebaptism.
Source? Or quit making things up.
SD