Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
I don't think it means that the mother or family committed some sin necessarily.

Right. The concept of ritual purity does not translate well to the modern understanding.

It's a catch-22 of sorts. If Mary is without sin, then she doesn't need the sin offering. But if she does not make the sin offering, then she has broken the Law, a sin in itself.

Yep!

47,811 posted on 04/21/2003 12:48:20 PM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47792 | View Replies ]


To: malakhi
It's a catch-22 of sorts. If Mary is without sin, then she doesn't need the sin offering. But if she does not make the sin offering, then she has broken the Law, a sin in itself.

Yep!

And, as was alluded to, the proper path is found in the Baptism of the Lord. Though Jesus certainly had no need to repent of his sins, he underwent the baptism anyway, to point the way for His followers and to show obedience.

SD

47,813 posted on 04/21/2003 12:52:40 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47811 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson