Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: OLD REGGIE
The question is, why include them in the first place? This is an example where "numbers" are meaningless.

Who said they were "included?" They are "tolerated" at best.

These people should never have been counted as "Catholics" in the first place. The Church should still be evangelizing them, but not accepting them into the Church until they were ready.

you do things your way, and we'll do them ours. We are more patient than the typical Protestant. If we can over a generation or two Christianize a people, we will do so. We dont' demand instant results.

SD

46,974 posted on 04/16/2003 8:40:10 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46972 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
you do things your way, and we'll do them ours. We are more patient than the typical Protestant. If we can over a generation or two Christianize a people, we will do so. We dont' demand instant results.

Is it fair to assume you include these "Catholics" when you say "Catholics believe . . . "?

BTW, The Catholic Church has existed in Mexico for hundreds of years. You must be considering some very long lived generations.

46,977 posted on 04/16/2003 9:00:42 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a cult of one? UNITARJEWMIAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46974 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson