Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
Associated Press ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 48,361-48,38048,381-48,40048,401-48,420 ... 65,521-65,537 next last
To: Havoc
Granted, you're addressing sacramental issues which are, for the most part, their "theological non-negotiables" but I still enjoyed it. :-)
48,381 posted on 04/24/2003 7:34:36 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48371 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
At the risk of appearing to venerate, I totally agree.

I've always understood that venerating was acceptable. :-)

48,382 posted on 04/24/2003 7:36:37 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48381 | View Replies]

To: the808bass
Not sure what the missus has up her sleeve next, but I'm sure it's more manual labor.

LOL. I did (unknowinly) the same thing this year with a project. I wanted some of our patio dug out, fence put up around what I left, a stepping stone sidewalk laid to go out of the fence, the fence painted, and a garden planted where the patio had been:). I figured it was a 1-2 day project:), nothing major.

Becky

48,383 posted on 04/24/2003 7:37:09 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48373 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
oops 48,382 was intended for you.
48,384 posted on 04/24/2003 7:38:09 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48380 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
1) You confuse the blood of humanity with the blood of Christ.

2) We (Lutherans, by the way) believe that the bread and wine are bread and wine, but that at the communion table those hosts are also the body and blood of Christ. The hosts don't lose their physical form, instead, they become invested with the actual presence of Christ.

48,385 posted on 04/24/2003 7:44:51 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48371 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
they become invested with the actual presence of Christ.

How does this happen? When?

48,386 posted on 04/24/2003 8:17:43 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48385 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Literal translation? Belief in literal translation.

It probably makes more sense to say "we believe what the bible means". It seems to be over simplistic to say we believe it is literal because there are parts that are figurative and parts that are typology. God does so much data compressing it is hard to explain how much is really in there.

48,387 posted on 04/24/2003 8:27:21 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48371 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
The bread and wine are consecrated at the speaking of the words of institution. In this, we rely largely upon I Corinthians 10:16 and 11:23-29.
48,388 posted on 04/24/2003 8:36:15 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48386 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
The bread and wine are consecrated at the speaking of the words of institution. In this, we rely largely upon I Corinthians 10:16 and 11:23-29.

Don't you think that's awfully weak, the notion that He is somehow mystically invested in the bread and wine by the speaking of the words? I sure don't see that in the bible.

In my previous life (;-), I donned the robe and poured the wine in the ELCA church. I might have given the Mo. Synod a try, if not for their having many of the same unbiblical beliefs.

48,389 posted on 04/24/2003 9:19:56 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48388 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
1) You confuse the blood of humanity with the blood of Christ.

Are you saying Jesus wasn't human? Carful now, this is a trap that you just set for yourself. Ain't faulty logic fun.

2) We (Lutherans, by the way) believe that the bread and wine are bread and wine, but that at the communion table those hosts are also the body and blood of Christ. The hosts don't lose their physical form, instead, they become invested with the actual presence of Christ.

IE you summon Christ down from heaven with your mighty powers invested in you to both defy scripture and blaspheme Christ by rendering him a liar through your accusatory action. Yes your actions do have ramifications. Christ said he sat down at the side of the Father and will not return till the end. You suggest you force him to return every time you do your encantations to turn bread and wine to blood and flesh. Now, either He's a liar because of your witness (blasphemy) or your philosophy is a lie. It can't be both ways.

48,390 posted on 04/24/2003 9:36:45 AM PDT by Havoc (If you can't be frank all the time are you lying the rest of the time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48385 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
The ELCA has disavowed the Augsburg Confession?

I Corinthians 10:16 reads:

The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not he communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?

48,391 posted on 04/24/2003 9:45:39 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48389 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
The trick is to read it in context. It's not any different than reading anything else save for the occasional need for assistance on deep spiritual matters that no man can determine on his own in the first place. Now here's the rub that should be a dead giveaway after all this time. The deep spiritual issues are resolved in a christian through the spirit. They are pursued and gotten wrong in wannabes because they apply logic and reason and try to figure it out on their own. Thus, Catholicism doesn't understand the nature of sin or of much anything else. It's tripped up by multiple baptisms because it doesn't understand the difference. etc.

It should be no object of amazement that they think one can only say Jesus is Lord if they are Spirit filled. They don't realize the true meaning being stated there. A devil worshipper could walk up unbeknownst to them and if he can say 'Jesus is Lord' they'd buy him as a long lost Christian Lamb. They view it all 2 dimensionally - I have Gas therefore I can fuel and drive a car. Well, Duh. That isn't the point. The point is that without the existance of Gas, you couldn't build the car - much less do anything else with it. It's no wonder their priests get their butts kicked in spiritual warfare..

48,392 posted on 04/24/2003 9:46:30 AM PDT by Havoc (If you can't be frank all the time are you lying the rest of the time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48387 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
While your relationship with the Lord is a personal one, I'm afraid that it is not your perogative to define the relationship of Christ with the remainder of his flock.

Those who choose to observe the Lord's Supper in the manner prescribed by the Apostle Paul, may offend you personally, but they, none-the-less, base their practice upon Scripture.

48,393 posted on 04/24/2003 9:53:49 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48390 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer; Mr. Lucky
In my previous life (;-), I donned the robe and poured the wine in the ELCA church. I might have given the Mo. Synod a try, if not for their having many of the same unbiblical beliefs.

Tell him about the holy rail.

48,394 posted on 04/24/2003 9:58:27 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48389 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
The trick is to read it in context. It's not any different than reading anything else save for the occasional need for assistance on deep spiritual matters that no man can determine on his own in the first place.

It is quite a spiritual thing to change the way a possible Christian views the bible. To change his perception fo the bible from the Living and Active Word of God to one of 3 possible inputs in a very convoluted religious puzzle is a major victory for the Adversary.

Now here's the rub that should be a dead giveaway after all this time. The deep spiritual issues are resolved in a christian through the spirit. They are pursued and gotten wrong in wannabes because they apply logic and reason and try to figure it out on their own. Thus, Catholicism doesn't understand the nature of sin or of much anything else. It's tripped up by multiple baptisms because it doesn't understand the difference. etc.

It is interesting how little time it actually takes to disciple a new Christian in the right direction when their hearts have been prepared to learn. A Lutheran friend of mine pointed out that through the Holy Spirit a Christian isn't magically endowed with knowledge, but he does have a supernatural discernment that will keep him from lies. It's an interesting thought. I've always wondered what would have been the outcome in my discipleship if I had hooked up with a JW or LDS or RC when I first got saved.

48,395 posted on 04/24/2003 10:05:28 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48392 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
The ELCA has disavowed the Augsburg Confession?

I doubt it. But, I left the ELCA many years ago, just a few months after my second birth, ill-equipped at the time to be the Lone Ranger.

Corinthians 10:16 reads:
The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not he communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?

Of course. Don't you think that's awfully weak, the notion that He is somehow mystically invested in the bread and wine by the speaking of the words? I sure don't see that in the bible.

48,396 posted on 04/24/2003 10:21:39 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48391 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
I Corinthians 10:16 reads:


The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not he communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?
It wouldn't be much of a remembrance if the verse said ...
The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not he communion of the fruit of the vine ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of bread ?
... would it ?

48,397 posted on 04/24/2003 10:32:53 AM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48391 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Luthern, huh? I used to work for Good Samaritan. I liked the way yall took care of the elderly. I was invited to go to Sioux Falls once and was very impressed with the evangalism I witnessed at their corp. office. Anyway, I don't speak for other baptists but just myself when I say that I see this a little differently. I am paticipating in a sacred remembrance. The bread (or cracker in our case :)) and wine (grape juice of course!) are symbolic to me. I feel that I am in Jesus' presence but not that He is literally in the bread and wine. I too, take verse 27 very seriously and have actually "passed" before when I felt I wasn't in the spirit as I needed to be.
48,398 posted on 04/24/2003 10:52:31 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48388 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky; Havoc
Those who choose to observe the Lord's Supper in the manner prescribed by the Apostle Paul, may offend you personally, but they, none-the-less, base their practice upon Scripture.

1 CORINTHIANS 10:
[16] The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?
[17] Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread.


Let's carry your "interpretation" of Paul's teaching to it's logical conclusion:

There is one bread.

we who are many, who partake of this one bread, are one body.

We are the actual flesh and blood of Jesus? (Purposely rediculous.)

Consider:

1 Corinthians 11:
24 and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, "This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me."
25 In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me."
26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes.


Bread and cup. Still bread and cup.


48,399 posted on 04/24/2003 11:03:16 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48393 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Hi Reggie
48,400 posted on 04/24/2003 11:09:06 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48399 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 48,361-48,38048,381-48,40048,401-48,420 ... 65,521-65,537 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson