Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
Associated Press ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 46,801-46,82046,821-46,84046,841-46,860 ... 65,521-65,537 next last
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
LOL, you'll make a great horse trainer:)

Hey, I've got kids. How different could it be? ;o)

46,821 posted on 04/15/2003 8:38:32 AM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46782 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Why not. They were naked.

I think the proper theological term is "nekkid."

46,822 posted on 04/15/2003 8:39:38 AM PDT by ksen (HHD,FRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46808 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; biblewonk
Stick to what the Bible says or remain silent. That's your philosophy, so do it.

What the bible says on this point is crystal clear to all but those whose understanding is blinded by their manmade traditions. Mary had other children, Jesus's brothers and sisters. Of course, in order to shore up their extra-biblical, elevated status for His mother, the RC system conveniently perverts the Word of God, claiming His brothers weren't really His "brothers." For some reason, we're supposed to believe they really meant his "cousins" when they said, "Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not His mother called Mary, and His brothers, James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? And His sisters, ..."

Nah, we need the "P"erpetual "V"irginity doctrine because it fits so well with our even more unsupportable doctrines concerning her bodily assumption and her "I"mmaculate "C"onception.

It's a manmade system based entirely upon God's silence and man's perversion of the true Gospel.

46,823 posted on 04/15/2003 8:40:00 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46801 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
But it does not say that they had sex.

You're right "not till she had brought forth her firstborn son."

46,824 posted on 04/15/2003 8:40:26 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46818 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Matthew 1:24 says that Joseph took Mary as his wife. But it does not say that they had sex.

Agreed. Verse 25 provides us with the extra testimony that Joseph knew not his wife until the birth of her firstborn son.

46,825 posted on 04/15/2003 8:44:21 AM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46818 | View Replies]

To: malakhi; biblewonk; newgeezer
Made of sounds even more like Jesus had some sort of genetic relationship to Mary. Which is exactly the opposite of what newgeezer and biblewonk say the words imply.

Yep. And it is strange to talk of a man being "made of a woman." If this merely meant that Jesus was human, but from some new line straight out of heaven, wouldn't the inclusive "man" be used?

And if not Mary, then what "woman" was he "made" of?

SD

46,826 posted on 04/15/2003 8:44:45 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46820 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Mary had other children, Jesus's brothers and sisters.

Please refer me to any Biblical citation where anyone other than Jesus is referred to as a child of Mary.

SD

46,827 posted on 04/15/2003 8:45:44 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46823 | View Replies]

To: Quester
Verse 25 provides us with the extra testimony that Joseph knew not his wife until the birth of her firstborn son.

Right. Which testifys to the miraculous nature of His Birth, not to the intra-marital dynamic.

SD

46,828 posted on 04/15/2003 8:46:53 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46825 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
In other words those who figure their efforts to keep the law will save them are cursed.

And, if the psalms are any indication, David didn't see the Law that way. Which tells me that he kept the Law out of love for God, not out of trying to be saved by his own efforts. As someone who sinned, he understood grace and forgiveness.

46,829 posted on 04/15/2003 8:47:15 AM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46791 | View Replies]

To: malakhi; biblewonk; SoothingDave
If anything, I'd think "born of" could, in a stretch, mean Mary as a "surrogate mother". Made of sounds even more like Jesus had some sort of genetic relationship to Mary. Which is exactly the opposite of what newgeezer and biblewonk say the words imply.

That's understandable. It proves there is little benefit to looking at the words in a vacuum, apart from the context of Scripture.

46,830 posted on 04/15/2003 8:47:32 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46820 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; SoothingDave
I have also been told that if you take a cats kill away from it, it will quit hunting, My cat is here to keep mice out of the house. So he gets to keep what ever he kills.

But when a cat gives you something it kills, it is showing its love for you. It is the greatest gift a cat can give!

46,831 posted on 04/15/2003 8:48:45 AM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46793 | View Replies]

To: malakhi; SoothingDave
I guess my cat is selfish, he hasn't brought me anything:), he just leaves the guts, or head laying around after he eats the choice parts.

Becky
46,832 posted on 04/15/2003 8:51:39 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46831 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Please refer me to any Biblical citation where anyone other than Jesus is referred to as a child of Mary.

I know you disagree with the identification, but

Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon, and are not his sisters here with us? (Mark 6:3)

There were also women looking on from afar, among whom were Mary Mag'dalene, and Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salo'me (Mark 15:40)

46,833 posted on 04/15/2003 9:00:18 AM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46827 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
But when a cat gives you something it kills, it is showing its love for you. It is the greatest gift a cat can give!

Exactly. But to give it up before he even really hurt it at all is simply remarkable. I think he had already had his fill and was bored from the other one.

SD

46,834 posted on 04/15/2003 9:02:20 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46831 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
he just leaves the guts, or head laying around after he eats the choice parts

Really. Our cat Joey is an avid mouser. Once I found a whole mouse wedged between two boxes in the basement. He must have been playing with it, and got it stuck where he couldn't get it out. But usually I don't find anything left over. Maybe a tail.

46,835 posted on 04/15/2003 9:03:04 AM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46832 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
I guess my cat is selfish, he hasn't brought me anything:), he just leaves the guts, or head laying around after he eats the choice parts.

That's his "tithe."

Last year one night he lined up 6 mouse heads all in a row. It was not a random lineup, he wanted to display them as a gift.

SD

46,836 posted on 04/15/2003 9:03:59 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46832 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer; malakhi
It proves there is little benefit to looking at the words in a vacuum, apart from the context of Scripture.

In other words, "we can't explain" and "You are ignorant of Scripture for even asking."

Thanks for playing. Run along now.

SD

46,837 posted on 04/15/2003 9:05:33 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46830 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
Really

Yeah, it's really an eyeopener to get up thru the night, walk thru a dark house and step on a pile of guts, or a head, especially in summer when your barefooted. Yuck!

Becky

46,838 posted on 04/15/2003 9:06:47 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46835 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; biblewonk
Please refer me to any Biblical citation where anyone other than Jesus is referred to as a child of Mary.

I'm sure the RC system has a pat answer to explain this away. Perhaps His "brothers" and "sisters" weren't Mary's children. Maybe they were His half-siblings, by Joseph and a different woman. Perhaps the terms "brothers" and "sisters" were used in a generic sense, such that these people are merely his kin. Maybe they're not blood relations, but spiritual brothers and sisters.

The system is consistent. Whatever it takes, the objective is to support a blind adherence to the perverted Gospel. Whether speaking of the written word or the Word made flesh, the Word of God is entirely insufficient.

46,839 posted on 04/15/2003 9:07:48 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46827 | View Replies]

To: All
Thought I would post a section called "The Servant Leadership Model" from a book I'm reading called "Restoring our Lost Legacy" by John D. Garr.

All comments are welcome.

One of the reasons for division in the church is the fact that its leders too often have ignored our Lord's admonition, "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them.....Yet it shall not be so among you.........whoever desires to be first among you, let him be your slave" (Matthew 20:25-27). Jesus never inteded that a professional clergy elevate itself above the rest of the church to form an elite ruling class. The system in which he, himself, had been reared and in which the apostles had functi8oned was a synagogal Judaism, an egalitarian exercise which featured the interaction of a multitude of conselors the model in which the safe exercise of leadership can be found (Proverbs 11:14). Plurality of eldership and collective decision making were the norm in the earliest church (Acts 6:3; 15:6; Galatians 2:9).

When church leaders in suceeding generations neglected the servant leadership paradigm which Jesus demonstrated, they began to model their leadship styles after the autocratic political and/or business systems of their societies. Leaders became increasingly turf-protective, seeking to preserve and extend the aegis of their dominion. Sects within the church became more and more elitist and parochial. Increasingly, the church became a quasi-political organism, and leaders competed for political and economic power. Monarchial bishops assumed control over the church in geographic areas. Finally, the bishop of Rome sought to establish his primacy over the entire church, an effort that culminated in the establishment of the papacy, producting susequent abuses of power and precipitating the East-West schism. Christianity became Christendom.

When the Reformation came, leaders adopted the models of government common to their societies. Nationalism produced state churches and an ever-increasing sectarianism, as movements crystallized into entrenched bureaucracies. Unfortunately, these denominations escalated the infighting and strife within Christianity. Still others arose seeking reform from newly entrenched strutures; however, their efforts produced other crystallized movements, fostering still more divisions in the universal church.

When men seek for dominion within self-serving bureacracies rather than sacrificing their egos to submit themselves one to another in a humble search for truth, they have allowed demonic strongholds to be erected in their lives that bind them in pride, conceit, and arrogance and produce abusive behavior that wounds and weakens the members of the body of Christ. When the church departs from the servant-leadership principle espoused and employed by Jesus and the apostles, it reads dangerous ground.

It should be noted that Jesus ascribed abusive exercises of power as being typical of Gentiles, implying that such condust was not the norm in Hebrew society in which the disciples had been reared. This was especially true in the religious life of the Israeli people. Though the priesthood and the temple order remained important, the daily religious practices of the people had centered in their synagogues since the time of the Babylonian captivity. Synagogal Judaism was the firs grand experiment in the democratization of religion. Iwas this model, rather than the Gentile examples, that the apostles were to employ in their exercise of leadship over the reformed congregation of Jesus.

Here is the biblical description of servant leadership:"...a servant of the Lord must not quarrel but be gentle to all, able to teach, patient, in humility correcting those who are in oppostion, if God perhaps will grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth" (2 Timothy 2:24,25). Whoever is the chiefest in the churches, let him employ this kind of conduct inproviding oversight for God's people.

Surely the church can now return to that model that was manifest in its earliest years. When leaders learn to serve rather than "lord it over" God's heritage, they will be able to avoid the attitudes that have promoted division. When they are submitted to one another in love, they can promote the unity that the church so desperately needs.

Can I get a couple of amens? (at least) :-)

46,840 posted on 04/15/2003 9:12:09 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46826 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 46,801-46,82046,821-46,84046,841-46,860 ... 65,521-65,537 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson