Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Frumious Bandersnatch
So if I understand what you are saying, then something can be scientific and false and something else can be non-scientific but true. Silly me, I always thought that science was in search of truth.

You must not understand me, then. "Falsifiable" doesn't mean "false."

854 posted on 04/02/2002 9:26:38 AM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs
I think that I do.  Basically you predict the behavior of a theory if one or more of the basic tenets or parameters to that theory are also changed.  I don't know if you are understanding what I'm trying to say.  I'm not necessarily claiming ID to be a theory so much as a theorem.  As a theorem it works much more nicely that random chance.
857 posted on 04/02/2002 9:49:43 AM PST by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson