Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
. . . anything "could" have evolved.

Anything supposedly irreducibly complex could have, yes, so arguments that it could not possibly have are just wrong. All that is needed is some kind of scaffolding effect. In the flagellum case, the "scaffolding" is its secretory function.

736 posted on 04/01/2002 8:14:27 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
In the flagellum case, the "scaffolding" is its secretory function

You even give more credence to the author's argument than he does. He only suggests a possibility. The word is credulous.

738 posted on 04/01/2002 8:22:43 AM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 736 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson