Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
That is because with just so stories, anything "could" have evolved. That is Dawkins faulty assertion.

The point is, by showing the manner in which something may have evolved the author is demonstrating that one need not rely upon "Godidit" as an explanation. Whether the evolution in question occurred as stated is irrelevant insofar as it illustrates that such processes could take place without resorting to the supernatural.

734 posted on 04/01/2002 7:59:44 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
Whether the evolution in question occurred as stated is irrelevant insofar as it illustrates that such processes could take place without resorting to the supernatural.

That depends on your definition of "supernatural".

737 posted on 04/01/2002 8:16:43 AM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson