I forget what you think you did on worms. Lynx, I remember. You attempted to demonstrate, or attempted to appear to demonstrate, that nothing Malthusian is going on when lynxes and hares overpopulate and crash in staggered cycles. As someone once told you, you don't score nearly the points you think with your style of argument. Why do you assume no one but you can see through essentially transparent attempts at razzle-dazzle?
You, both times.
[Clack][Clack]
I'll dig up more info on the poor starving Lynx if you really want to bring that up again. There is a paper showing that Lynx move (nearly 3000 miles IIRC) rather than die as you contend.