My head spins. Obviously, anything anyone ever deconstructs as evolvable will simply be discarded as "not a good IC example."
I don't see why. After all, that statement is practically an extension of the Darwinian argument for evolution. In any case if something is "proved" IC (something that Darwinian evolution denies as necessary for itself) then anything using that IC construct acquires the IC character, at least that is how it seems to me.