Replies

First of all the article says the cytochrome c's of chimps and humans are identical. ARE YOU NOW SAYING THAT THE ARTICLE THAT YOU AND OTHERS CONSTANTLY GIVE AS PROOF OF EVOLUTION WAS A LIE?????????

No, I am not. Calm down.

I agree that the cytochrome cs are identical.

I also insist that there has been one mutation to the genome.

I also insist that you cannot have carefully read the article you claim to have rebutted. How do I know this?

It's a highly conserved gene to have had only one mutation since humans and chimps diverged.

in post#650 you said the above, you now say:

I agree that the cytochrome cs are identical.
I also insist that there has been one mutation to the genome.

You are trying to weasel out of your statement. Furthermore, even your last statement is contradictory (like the article that Stultis posted and you agreed was the best proof of evolution in those 29 evidences). Things cannot be identical if there is something different about them. If you try to weasel out of that by saying that you were speaking of the total genome of man and chimp then that is also nonsense since there is far more difference between man and chimp than one DNA base pair difference in the 3 billion DNA base pairs in humans and chimps.