Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
It is the height of arrogance to force the readers of this thread to wade through seas of verbiage to see if your point is correct.

This plea would be touching if you weren't always claiming that there's no evidence for evolution what-so-any. But let anyone link a substantive article (such as Theobald's that summarizes in barest outline 29 separate and distinct lines of evidence all pointing toward evolution), you cry foul on the grounds of "seas of verbiage."

There's too much evidence for us to be posting in-line on thread after thread just because you're born new and trolling for suckers on thread after thread. Get Duane Gish, Walt Brown, or Ken Ham to write 29 Excuses not to See the Evidence. Then you'll have something that summarizes your position to link in response.

646 posted on 03/31/2002 4:20:33 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
I already disproved the article Stultis posted on post#649. Enjoy.
658 posted on 03/31/2002 5:37:35 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson