Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
I don't believe Gore3000 was the first person to say that junk DNA isn't junk. The idea goes back quite a period. Over 95 percent of DNA has largely unknown function.

g3 still claims he can prove that there is NO junk DNA. He can explain every single base pair. I'm just asking him to post it. No one else has this information. A couple dozen articles doesn't cover a single human chromosome. Where's the beef?

624 posted on 03/31/2002 9:31:33 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]


To: 1/1,000,000th%
g3 still claims he can prove that there is NO junk DNA.

I did not say that. What I did say is that the assumption by evolutionists (made before there was any evidence either way) that non-coding DNA was junk was proven absolutely wrong. I have shown you two articles proving that assumption wrong. Andrew C showed you another one. Therefore the evolutionist assumption is totally wrong and it is up to evolutionists now to show that any of that non-coding DNA is indeed junk. Let me also say, that evolutionists also said for a long time that the appendix and the tonsils were useless leftovers from previous species man descended from. That 'assumption from ignorance' by evolutionists has also been proven wrong. Luckily for us, medical scientists did not listen to the garbage from the evolutionist theologians.

655 posted on 03/31/2002 5:27:56 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson