Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
It was Malthus and his chicken-little theory that formed the basis for natural selection.

Can you show me the written connections? This is interesting.

412 posted on 03/28/2002 11:29:07 PM PST by Quila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]


To: Quila
It was Malthus and his chicken-little theory that formed the basis for natural selection. -me-

Can you show me the written connections? This is interesting."

Here's some examples from The Descent of Man:
Civilised populations have been known under favourable conditions, as in the United States, to double their numbers in twenty-five years; and, according to a calculation, by Euler, this might occur in a little over twelve years. (57. See the ever memorable 'Essay on the Principle of Population,' by the Rev. T. Malthus, vol. i. 1826. pp. 6, 517.) ....

There is reason to suspect, as Malthus has remarked, that the reproductive power is actually less in barbarous, than in civilised races. ...

Savages, when hard pressed, encroach on each other's territories, and war is the result; but they are indeed almost always at war with their neighbours. They are liable to many accidents on land and water in their search for food; and in some countries they suffer much from the larger beasts of prey. Even in India, districts have been depopulated by the ravages of tigers.

Malthus has discussed these several checks,

Some examples from the Origin of the Species:

In the next chapter the Struggle for Existence amongst all organic beings throughout the world, which inevitably follows from their high geometrical powers of increase, will be treated of. This is the doctrine of Malthus, applied to the whole animal and vegetable kingdoms. ...

A struggle for existence inevitably follows from the high rate at which all organic beings tend to increase. Every being, which during its natural lifetime produces several eggs or seeds, must suffer destruction during some period of its life, and during some season or occasional year, otherwise, on the principle of geometrical increase, its numbers would quickly become so inordinately great that no country could support the product. Hence, as more individuals are produced than can possibly survive, there must in every case be a struggle for existence, either one individual with another of the same species, or with the individuals of distinct species, or with the physical conditions of life. It is the doctrine of Malthus applied with manifold force to the whole animal and vegetable kingdoms; for in this case there can be no artificial increase of food, and no prudential restraint from marriage. Although some species may be now increasing, more or less rapidly, in numbers, all cannot do so, for the world would not hold them.

So yes, Darwin's theory is heavily dependent on Malthus's discredited chicken-little theory.

525 posted on 03/30/2002 10:59:52 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson