Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Goldhammer
O.K., to clarify, I am using following definition of proof: "A theory is proven if it can be demonstrated (however you may choose) that it entails its own truth." It is in this sense that I claim that scientific theories are not and cannot be "proven". I am confident that virtually all reflective scientists and philosphers would agree in this. Indeed you seem to agree in this. You are using a different definition of "proof," which is fine insofar as used consistently.
338 posted on 03/28/2002 3:11:53 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson