Perfect example of evolutionist arrogance, nothing can be said except what they say. I talked about intelligence. I said that the evolutionists give selection the qualities of intelligence, memory and thinking. No natural "force" can have those qualities, yet nothing without those qualities can design anything. So you and your fellow evolutionists may not be saying the above because it is totally absurd, but you are certainly trying to imply it. Selection cannot create anything. Selection is a purely destructive force. It can only cull what already exists, it cannot create anything new. Evolutionists have never been able to prove therefore how anything new has arisen that would justify their claim that selection achieved the turning of a miserable amoeba into a human being.
No, it's called "logic". Who said anything about evolution having intelligence?"
Perfect example of evolutionist arrogance, nothing can be said except what they say. I talked about intelligence.
You were responding to me and you were criticizing what I had written. Your comments about intelligence didn't make any sense in the context. Now you make up silly insults. Just deal with the question.
I said that the evolutionists give selection the qualities of intelligence, memory and thinking.
An utterly false statement, but I understand that it is one you probably believe. That would be your own short-sightedness at work. You can't imagine a process that doesn't involve intelligence so you believe others think as you do. You are wrong.
No natural "force" can have those qualities, yet nothing without those qualities can design anything.
No problem, life isn't designed.
So you and your fellow evolutionists may not be saying the above because it is totally absurd, but you are certainly trying to imply it.
No, we're not saying it.
Selection cannot create anything. Selection is a purely destructive force. It can only cull what already exists, it cannot create anything new.
Selection is only part of the process.
Evolutionists have never been able to prove therefore how anything new has arisen that would justify their claim that selection achieved the turning of a miserable amoeba into a human being.
See above.
Now deal with what we were actually talking about. Your suggested falsification is not a falsification. Does your silence imply that you finally acknowledge this?