Replies

Your whole long tirades are just an excuse for not giving any proof for the theory of evolution. You sound like Clinton, attacking everyone because of his own misdeeds, trying to belittle those who have done great things because your side has done nothing at all.

In describing a dry, two paragraph discussion of Boyle's Law and the Kinetic Theory of Gases as a "long tirade," you grant me unearned credit for rhetorical flourish.

Thanks!

You sound like Clinton, attacking everyone because of his own misdeeds, trying to belittle those who have done great things because your side has done nothing at all.

In what way was my pointing out your confusion of the Law of Gravity with the non-existant Theory of Gravity an "attack" on you (as distinct from an attack on your claim)? How was pointing out that Mendel's ratios are not only not "proven", but are not even factually true of numerous real world cases Clintonesque? How was my very politely demuring from your absurd implication that "relativity" tells us all we need to know about "atomic bombs" ad hominem?

For Gosh sakes, on that last point I even resisted pointing out to you that relativity theory deals with macroscopic phenomena, says nothing (directly) about nuclear interactions, and has little if anything to do with actually building "atom bombs".

Let us assume that I genuinely wanted to attack your claim that "gravity" is a "proved theory". Is there any possible way I could do that which would not cause you to squeal like a Palestinian caught with an explosive belt that you had been subjected to unfair personal attack?