I'm still waiting to see this. You know there's going to be a Nobel Prize and tons of fame and fortune for the person who can take down evolution scientifically.
It's been done repeatedly. The problem is that there is, in reality, no such thing as "proving" something; there is only such a thing as proving something to somebody's satisfaction. If the audience is too stupid or too brainwashed to deal with the proof, then the proof did not fly. Certain segments of American academia with their "peer-reviewed" journals are a closed loop, and I do not anticipate proving anything to them anytime soon. Under those circumstances, proving the case against evolutionism to judges, juries, and voters will have to suffice.
A little evidence would help here.
It's not just American, you're dealing with a worldwide conspiracy here.
I don't anticipate you proving anything to them either, not because of conspiracy, but because of lack of merit.