You guys have weird ego problems or something.
And again you have no idea what you are talking about.
As stated above, the answer is nebulis is wrong. If he had added "the presence of introns" to the statement that would be better and debatable.
What's so funny is you said cell wall and I didn't give you any trouble or grief but the type of failed attempt at technicality you guys make here vis-a-vis introns goes much more so in talking about cell wall.
It seems you want to play the argue game of mysideyourside, werightyouwrong.
I was hoping perhaps a discussion of molecular biology would have been on the way, but alas you guys can't help but be defensive and belligerant.
What are you scared of?
Here is where you once again cannot read. A thread on "Common Creationist Arguments" is not particularly [key music, dancing girls] The tallhappy Molecular Biology Quiz Hour!
It's really about anything we want it to be. If Aquinasfan wants to defend "I don't know; that would be second-guessing the Designer" as science, worth throwing out the accumulated knowledge so far of the history of life on earth, I'm free to attack. I could hardly restrain myself, really. You're free to make all the distractions you can bluster muster, but I doubt you can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear by yelling "Hey! Look over here! You're a poo-poo head!"
I can see why you tend to snipe a little and disappear for months at a time. Your style's too easy to solve.