Replies

Interesting comments, considering the Ultimate Resource has every crevo thread and link posted in the last three years -- including threads you've posted. And I did excerpt the relevant threads and links for you. If you refuse to peruse them, that's your problem. I don't care. But when you claim that no one ever gives you references to support their contentions you will be flat-out lying, and that's a sin, regardless of whether you think you are doing it for a good cause or not.

But when you claim that no one ever gives you references to support their contentions . . .

You mean Mr. "Post-it-here" has been complaining no one links him anything? Don't you know if it isn't posted in-line it just isn't real?

It is up to you to do the work of finding the proof to refute an opponent's theories. Just to say they are to be found in an encyclopedic work and go look for it refutes nothing. That is why I called your statement the ultimate in arrogance. It is also the ultimate in lameness. In addition, this is not a private discussion, it is a public one, with new people all the time reading these posts. It is your duty in such a discussion to put the facts before the readers, not to ask them to spend their life poring through links. The proper way to use references is to quote the parts relevant to the point being made and to then link to the whole work (when it is to an article on the net) to verify that the quote is not out of context.

Therefore, since you claim to know where the proof of macro-evolution is, post it here instead of asking all the readers to go sifting through numerous threads. I would think that you would be proud to show new readers the proof of your theory - or is the claim to having given such proof not true?