Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: medved
The claim is only made because some assume that a thick crust would be necessary to support the observed topography, while others have theorized that topography may simply be being thrown up faster than it can settle back in, due to the heat and subsurface energetics of the planet.

That's just ridiculous. You're saying the mountains are on thin crust but they're replenished by what amounts to vulcanism. They're basically riding on convection and bubbles?

The Russians put a lander on Venus. We have pictures. It's a rock and a hard place. And we know it isn't all that volcanic. You need something that makes Io look like the moon. Read over that link.

Then again, you don't have to read it. It's the stuff they hammered at you to no avail for a decade or so at TalkOrigins before you decided to come spam preach to us instead.

391 posted on 03/15/2002 12:53:53 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]


To: ThinkPlease
A getting burned out by inane creation tactics bump.
393 posted on 03/15/2002 1:03:28 PM PST by ThinkPlease
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson