I told you that I'd answered your same exact post a year ago. I had.
I never at either time claimed that I was addressing your albedo argument, which is only one linchpin of medvedian Velikovskianism. Your standard spam post puts the albedo argument in exactly that context, the support for planetary ping-pong.
That's what I attacked as false and ridiculous. That's what I said I attacked.
Your claim to understand that I was advertising a destruction of your albedo argument looks from here like a distraction. I was calling you on your spamming, as I did again in 308 of this thread after your 303.