I thought at the time you were still ragging me with your "misrepresentation" stuff. Evidently, from what you've said since, you were ragging Junior at that point for less than nothing. A generalization, IIRC. You speak in riddles too much, you know.
But don't let me reassure you. Maybe you're onto something. Maybe we've all been having fun with you for thread after thread after thread.
I find this one of the more annoying habits of certain folks on these threads. It is as if they assume that you understand what they are getting at -- however, as more than half of all communications is non-verbal, and as that particular half is missing from the internet, one needs to be a bit more detailed in one's commentary for others to understand the gist of a point.
As I said it is not paranoia to point out inconsistencies or strange things. You have now confirmed that it was strange to answer that question, but you have not adequately answered why specifically you answered a post meant for No-Kin. Your excuse is that you were confused and further make the ludicrous point that ripping the guts out of a statement and changing its meaning is nothing.
My post was to No-Kin explaining why he was involved. It was your paranoia which focused on the misrepresentation reference in the post to him which apparently caused your confusion.