It sells rather well after so many years
It sells rather well after so many years
That doesn't sound altogether like a cease and desist order...
Let me take one more shot at explaining the situation. The people doing the crybaby acts here amount to a little clique of a half dozen evolutionists who attempt to dominate these evolution/creation threads by ganging up on other posters. I mean, it is not as if they wre trying to conduct a conversation amongst themselves and I were interfering or anything like that. You get some long article as an initial post on one of these threads and then the clique sits there potshotting anybody else who tries to say anything for another 200 or so posts. All I'm really interfering with is their potshotting proclivities and even that interference is so minimal that a person with a 486-based or better computer and a 56K modem won't really notice it.
What really bothers them is that I have condensed a number of unanswerable arguments against evolutionism into a frighteningly cogent and readable little package and am putting that into the hands of the common man, who is typically not aware that the most major opposition to evolutionism comes from the realm of mathematics and mathematicians and not from Christian groups, or that virtually all competent scientists who have taken the trouble to examine the situation now believe that evolution is FUBAR. You can read large selections of such commentary at the evolusham.com site.
In other words, the thing they are calling spam is a public-service message containing complex arguments and lines of reasoning which this little clique would just as soon the common man not have access to, and real information as opposed to the essentially content-free 60% bulk of all posts on these crevo-threads.
I can understand why somebody running a conservative forum such as FR would just as soon never hear about evolution debates, nonetheless I do not see it as avoidable. Evolution poisons morality, politics, and science equally. The idea that "survival of the fittest" is the only moral law in nature is a logical consequence of and unavoidable part of evolutionism and, once somebody buys into that, there is no further basis for morality.
Aside from the nazi and communist regimes which were based on that idea, we've just witnessed eight years of an American fascist regime run by people who clearly could not possibly conduct themselves the way they did and do if they were to believe in anything other than this Darwinistic humanism which they do.
Or as Newt Gingrich put it, the question of whether a person views his fellow man as a fellow child of God or as a meat byproduct of some stochastic process simply has to affect human relations.
The people who push evolutionism the hardest are generally democrats and socialists. Basically, there are few things you could do which would cause those people more angst, confusion, and frustration than disconnecting the teaching of evolution from public funding. That would be right in there with disconnecting the democrat party from their union funding sources.
Again, as I see it, I am doing a public service, and I see thank-yous from more people than are crying and carping here on this one thread.