Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior
And the genes coding for that eye-spot (not true eye, as you keep saying) would be similar

What absolute garbage! How were the genes transferred from the Euglena to man? Super-evo molecular transference? There are hundreds of species between Euglena and man in your stupid evo trees that had no eyes. Let's see some proof not garbage from you folk.

1,984 posted on 03/26/2002 4:50:37 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1978 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
How were the genes transferred from the Euglena to man?

You stupid, stupid boy. Have you not gleaned one thing from these discussions (you haven't, as is readily apparent). Okay, I'll type s-l-o-w-l-y so you can understand it. There WAS NO TRANSFER OF GENES FROM EUGLENA TO MAN. Both received that particular gene from a common ancestor that lived a V-E-R-Y long time ago. Are you completely incapable of comprehending even simple evolutionary concepts? If so, why do you consider yourself able to refute the theory? All you refute are a few strawmen that you toss up (the Java Man thingy comes to mind).

2,016 posted on 03/26/2002 7:45:17 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1984 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson