Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: No-Kin-To-Monkeys
Excellent. Mammals and birds both came from reptiles, but a bird is not a mammal.

tallhappy said "mammal ear bones from lizard jaws" was junk science and I corrected him for misusing "lizard." But the "-saur" in "dinosaur" means "lizard."

Mammals came from a line of reptiles.

Birds came from a line of reptiles.

1,881 posted on 03/25/2002 12:51:58 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1878 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Mammals came from a line of reptiles. Birds came from a line of reptiles.

The concept is clear. I haven't studied the evidence, which is all-important in supporting such a concept. I understand there is some controversy, but I'm really not qualified to leap into that one. The end result is consistent with declaring that mammals and birds are both creations of God, each different in their own way from the reptiles, and all partaking in the glory of creation. See, Vade, this evolution stuff isn't stressing me anywhere near as much as you thought it would.

1,885 posted on 03/25/2002 1:02:51 PM PST by No-Kin-To-Monkeys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1881 | View Replies ]

To: VadeRetro
Mammals came from a line of reptiles.

Birds came from a line of reptiles.

And the proof? None at all. I have been asking for proof of such macro-evolution for over a year on these threads - and have yet to see it. All you do is repeat the same mantra - just like the Communists and the Nazis repeated the same lies on and on hoping people would believe them to be true. Prove it instead of constantly asserting that evolution is true because the facts must fit evolution.

1,969 posted on 03/25/2002 9:35:42 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1881 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson