You claimed you had not seen it even though it had been posted twice, it had been posted to you once and the post you responded to had the number of the post on which it was originally given but you still said I had not defined it. Blame your dishonesty not me.
I reposted it because even though I had given you the post#1175 where it was originally posted, even though I had posted the article directly to you, you continued to deny that I had said what the definition of macro-evolution is.
SO LOOK IN THE MIRROR AND BLAME THE LIAR WHO DENIED WHAT HE KNEW VERY WELL HAD ALREADY BEEN SAID.
Not that you or any of the evolutionists here would bother to discuss it even after it has been posted three times. The statement is correct and speaks for itself so you have make up phony issues to attack me.