It is the actual coding of genes for similar proteins, and more traditionally the proteins themselves, that are mostly compared across species. You can't just count the genes. Of course, you can also learn a lot comparing the location and content of viral DNA introns. That's another line of evidence that humans and chimps are recently diverged.
Your model is a waste of arithmetic. You multiplied or divided by everything but your birth date but I've learned not to look at the fancy footwork.
It is the actual coding of genes for similar proteins, and more traditionally the proteins themselves, that are mostly compared across species.
Which does not refute my statement above and does not change anything I said in my post. In fact what it does show, is that you were denying something you knew to be true. That is called dishonesty.