[far sider]

You need to understand that only a few creationists are lying or presented slanted facts and distortions of reality. The majority of them honestly believe the inane babble that they were taught by the lying few, so when a creationist tells you that the earth's magnetic field decay rate is such that the planet would have been uninhabitable even one-hundred thousand years ago it is more likely that they believe it to be true rather than that they are simply lying and hoping you won't already know that the earth's magnetic field oscillates regularly

Nobody knows that it oscillates. That's just another ad hoc theory evolutionists use to explain inconvenient facts of science. "We just happen to be in the decreasing part of the oscillation." Just like nutrinos just happen to become "undetectable" when they pass by the earth.

I am a creationist. If I express my beliefs about Creation it's because I've studied them and I believe them. So please don't say that all Creationists are liars or just parroting what they've heard from others, just because you disagree with them.

[Doctor Stochastic]

Nobody knows that it oscillates.

There's some pretty good evidence in the layers of rocks with alternating magnetic orientation. The rock layers on ocean floors have patterns agreeing with those on land. The oscillation of earth's magnetic field isn't an ad hoc hypothesis, it has a rock solid foundation.

Just like nutrinos just happen to become "undetectable" when they pass by the earth.

What's this supposed to mean? Do you believe that neutrinos would be detectable somewhere else? What evidence do you have about neutrino detectability?