Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: edsheppa
Philosophically speaking – with pure naturalism – who can say what Bill Clinton did was wrong. I mean, Monica vs. Hillary? It’s relative.
1,204 posted on 03/21/2002 6:59:21 PM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1203 | View Replies ]


To: Heartlander
"Philosophically speaking – with pure naturalism – who can say what Bill Clinton did was wrong. I mean, Monica vs. Hillary? It’s relative."

Actually, and I hate to say it, but you are only half right on the above. Evolutionally speaking what Clinton did with Monica was correct and perfectly moral. He got his Lewinsky and kept his job. So he showed "survival of the fittest" quite explicitly and he demonstrated the corrolary of it that "might makes right".

1,229 posted on 03/21/2002 9:20:55 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1204 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander
...who can say what Bill Clinton did was wrong. I mean, Monica vs. Hillary?

Hardly a scientific question, eh? Certainly you agree that in the realm of science the assumption of naturalism has been very fruitful? It seems to me that supernaturalism will have to establish a similar track record to displace it.

1,232 posted on 03/21/2002 10:12:31 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson