I have stated that reasoning from an evolutionary framework says that dinosaurs did not have mammary glands. If you're curious, all you have to do is give up. If you can reproduce the evolutionary reasoning, all you have to do is do so. I promise not to say, "That's not it" if you get it right. We both know that ID has nothing to say on the subject one way or the other.
Why do you pretend not to see questions? You freqently seek to impose conclusions upon evolutionary theory that it does not make for itself. Why not show that your arguments are well-founded because you understand what you are rejecting?
All you have to do to end this is 1) give up or 2) provide the evolutionary reasoning why there were no teats on a dinosaur, ever. I've certainly asked you enough times to do one or the other.
Like I said you have no proof. You are using circular reasoning. You say since evolution is true, and evolution says dinosaurs did not have mammary glands therefore dinosaurs did not have mammary glands. That is proof of nothing. Circular reasoning proves nothing except either lack of analytic powers or firm adherence to an irrational ideology.
Therefore as I said, paleontology is bunk. It cannot answer the questions which it proclaims to be able to answer. Since the development of mammals and mammalian features is one of the most important evolutionary events and it cannot give proof of it in any way - paleontology is bunk.