If you read the rest of the post, I did address the questions he brought up. Do you do anything but carp at the way the game is played? Do you ever actually add anything to the debate on either side?
I didn't see that. I saw what you consider addressing the question as proselyltizing.
To address you would have to acknowledge clearly the question asked -- which you didn't do, you denied its validity out of hand. How or why would you answer a question you say makes no sense?
Buddy, science is carping.