Then why is the wiring in front of the light sensitive sensors, what advantage does this design have? Why is it a good design if the wiring (blood vessels and nerves) has to penetrate the retina? (This spot has therefore no lightsensors, hence it is called the "blind spot".)
I don't deny that the resolution of the eye is higher than that of present CCD panels but that's not the point. The resolution of a CCD panel can be at least in principle as high or even higher than that of the eye. In that case a camera with a resolution that equals that of the eye is better than the eye because the wiring isn't in the way. (Similar to the squid's eye where blood vessels and nerves are behind the retina)
Furthermore, why are the sensitivity curves of the "green" and "red" sensors practically congruent? That too isn't very intelligent IMO but that's just my opinion.
Then why is the wiring in front of the light sensitive sensors, what advantage does this design have?I answered you already. We cannot do better with all our science than what the eye does. When we can (if ever), perhaps we can criticize how the eye was made, not before. Can you do better? No. Then don't criticize what you don't know about.